Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts

Friday, February 18, 2011

Work for free? That's a bit rich


It's a cut throat world out there in Fleet Street.

In one of the most competitive industries in the world, getting your chance to shine is a task not to be taken lightly.

The recession has done little to ebb the insatiable desire to know as more and more wannabe journos pile out onto the streets.

Students go to any means to stand out from their competitors; multi-coloured CVs, sandwich-boards and even posting letters day and night to prove their worth.

You'd think we were auditioning to be the next Cheryl Cole with her champagne luxe lifestyle. Instead a poorly-paid career sitting in front of a computer screen, scrawling on a notepad at speed and late hours await. The news never stops and nor do we.

Journalism is a labour of love. We forget the poor wages - some regional presses offer newly graduated men and women to join their papers a meagre £12,000-a-year - forget the hardship to get there and stick to our mantra, no pain no gain.

But far worse than the pressures of the recession are the latest obstacles determined to end young journos' reporting dreams for good.

Now media companies want to play wage limbo with reporter hopefuls - how low will you go to get your job?

With many starting positions in the region of £17,000, (forget London weighting!) can anyone afford to be a journalist anymore?

While on a placement at newspaper union, the NUJ, talk was rife of a work experience code - the plan to make employers pay the minimum wage for budding journalists.


Journo who I am?

As someone who has done their fair share of free work and gladly, TTG feels that it is time journalists got a cut for their efforts. What newspapers seem to forget is that most young journos, often twenty-something students aren't exactly rolling in it.

They have barely enough to buy a few cans of baked beans, let alone enough change to scrape together a train ticket or accommodation while they do their commute to an often London-based establishment. It just isn't feasible. Yet the pressure is on for grads to do long-term internships, some lasting up to a year, with a fiver here and there to keep you watered and fed. Employers cry out for experience but how are you meant to get experience if you can't first afford the experience? It's a vicious circle but like the idiom says, money makes the world go round.

The Conservatives came under fire -and rightly so - just last week after an internship was put up for a charity auction with the winning bid a whopping £8k. What message is this giving young people, like TTG perhaps, who just can't afford to pay up for an opportunity? Have the media finally conceded that journalism is now a career for the few? Should adverts come with the disclaimer 'working class graduates need not apply?' Considering the work and effort and time journalism involves, from university study and NCTJs to endless tea-making and voluntary work, shouldn't employers give us a break? (hopefully a paid one)

With editorial staff cut to the bone, small companies simply can't afford to give trainees a wage. In these hard times, that is understandable but how are nationals allowed to afford the same privilege? An editor at one of the nationals bluntly told me 'why would we pay someone when hundreds will do it for free?' Living in London doesn't come cheap and wages in the workplace should reflect the toll of Capital life.

If the Government wants to help get youngsters into work, they need to remedy this. Internships and experience are all well and good but funding MUST be there to help those who simply can't afford the cost of self-improvement.

Young people aren't afraid of a little hard work, they just need a little boost now and then.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Spews On The News - October 30

Welcome to today's Spews On The News, brought to you by Terrible Tory Girl

1. Happy 405th Birthday Ming! http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/29/clam -

Congratulations are in order for Ming! It would seem that the biology world haven't forgotten his two year reign as Lib Dem head - a 405 year old mollusc has uncannily been nicknamed Ming. Would this be a sneaky jibe at Campbell per chance?

2. The Copying Game: Irresponsible Journalism

Concerns of increasingly younger employees in the media have been realised after it was revealed that most of today's journos belong in the classroom.

Three reporters were seen bullying interviewees and tell-tale titting on national television broadcasts last night.

Cathy Newman, political correspondent of Channel 4, one of the accused, attacked Cameron for copying Sabre Party ideas. "You're just copying them aren't you?"

Julie Etchingham, of the popular Sky news crowd, giggled with pals of Blameron's immigration policy, deeming it as 'extermination.'

The other, a Paxmanophile, also on Channel 4, verbally lunged into Immigration Minister, Liam Byrnes, shouting 'Poles...poles...what about the Poles?' incessantly......

(Ed...And they say politics has gone to the dogs...looks more like the classroom to me)

(Ed. I retract that statement, it wasn't meant for broadcast. Sorry journo chums)

3. Millisand Stands Up Saudi King

David 'Brangelina' Millisand stood up his important date, King Abdullah, deciding instead to adopt a son. Millisand, who has since gone on paternity leave, claims the timing of the adoption was 'entirely coincidental.' As coincidental as the timing of the Labour leadership contest earlier this year and the foreign secretary job opening it would seem.

4. EngLand of Votes And Tory - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2759813.ece

Englots may be given the devolution franchise in years to come. Cam Cam and Scot Rifkind are up to their sleeves in paperwork for a bill to have only English MPs voting on English issues. While the Terrible Tory Girl herself welcomes such plans, there are a few hiccups to be cured.

1) What/who counts as English?

2) Considering most MPS are Scottish in Westminister, how could Scots vote on matters affecting their English constituencies?

3) And would these Scottish actually give the green-go ahead for this in the first place?

4) And if they did, wouldn't Scots and Welshies vote on the implementation of the bill thus defeating the whole point?

5) And if the bill were to be passed, where would the extra Britons go if there were to be a vote or debate in the commons - would they skulk in the corner like naughty school children?

6) And would Brown be able to give answers on English issues in PMQ?

5. EXCLUSIVE: Organic Food Is Healthier - http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/86972.php

Attention jacket potatoers, put down that ginormous, glutenous GM glazed doughnut and get munching homegrown greens. Scientists have discovered that organic food is in fact healthier than its non-fresh counterpart!

Apparently, perhaps thanks to financial incentives from organic companies, England's geniuses have proven organic food to be 40 per cent better than your run of the mill free range eggs or semi-skimmed milk.

Maybe that or perhaps that non-organic produce is pumped to the brim with chemicals and stabilisers has something to do with its unhealthy count.

To put it incolloquially or crudely, 'no shit, Sherlock.' Can I have a side order of real organic news?